Although we face
unique urban problems in our day, many of the strengths and weaknesses
of our present cities have been inherited directly from the nineteenth
century.
The impact of the Industrial Revolution marked
an entirely novel relationship between Western man and the organization
of his cities, cities whose urban complex was composed of elements
related within the context rules and a code practiced by inhabitant and
planner alike. The urban system's relationship with the social systems
(political power, learning, economy and religion) asserted itself upon
the average citizen and thus integrated him into the structure of a
given society.
In a given town, the urban
order might have related the position of an individual's house to the
cathedral and at the same time individualized him within a community
along the ribbon of the street. This urban plan was a direct projection
of the objectives of clergy, feudal lord or merchant guild.
This
urban order was shattered by the radical transformation brought about
by the Industrial Revolution. It was accompanied by a spontaneous and
unprecedented urbanization overflowing the walls of Europe's ancient
towns and the forming of new agglomerations, which not only changed the
spatial organization which existed, but also the mentality of the city
dweller himself.
The
city dweller was unable to assimilate this dramatic urban revolution
for he was now confronted with a spatial order devoid of its traditional
richness of meaning, an organization derived solely from the economic
cause of high demographic concentrations due to a capitalist-industrial
production.
In 1845, Friedrich Engels published The Condition of the Working Class in England,
in which he describes the conditions existing in Manchester, as a
result of the Industrial Revolution. Following is an excerpt of that
work:
"Every
great city has one or more slums, where the working-class is crowded
together. True, poverty often dwells in hidden alleys close to the
palaces of the rich; but, in general, a separate territory has been
assigned to it, where, removed from the sight of the happier classes,
it may struggle along as it can. These slums are pretty equally
arranged in all the great towns of England, the worst houses in the
worst quarters of the towns; usually one or two-storied cottages in
long rows, perhaps with cellars used as dwellings, almost always
irregularly built. These houses of three or four rooms and a kitchen
form, throughout England, some parts of London excepted the general
dwellings of the working-class. The streets are generally unpaved,
rough, dirty, filled with vegetable and animal refuse, without sewers
or gutters but supplied with foul, stagnant pools instead. Moreover,
ventilation is impeded by the bad, confused method of building of the
whole quarter, and since many human beings here live crowded into a
small space, the atmosphere that prevails in these working-men's
quarters may readily be imagined. Further, the streets serve as drying
grounds in fine weather; lines stretched across from house to house,
and hung with wet clothing".